Community Page
- www.rahulgaitonde.org Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- True, online has made it easier to access just what you want. But like the previous comment said, people could (and generally did) do that with paper versions too. As a result of which, most...
- Is it possible to link the N82 A-GPS to the iPod touch via Bluetooth in order to make the iPod aware of it's location and so enable it to make use of location centric apps ? It seems to me, you...
- what data plan is required on the nokia to do this.. currently on AT&T family share plan, but not unlimited internet plan or smart phone data plan
- I guess for those who are really into this stuff, they could afford paying real money for digital stuff like clothes for their avatar. Or maybe a really good marketing strategy plays a part too....
- Interesting point, about people generally wanting information that confirms their own prejudices. I guess there is truth to that. With online news, I think it's still generally the same as with...
Jump to original thread »
So you blog, post comments, use Twitter, post photos on Flickr, videos on Youtube, talk with friends on half-a-dozen networking sites, and yes, send and receive tons of email.Â
Which is all very fine. Until the day you die.
What happens to your digital possessions after y ... Continue reading »
Which is all very fine. Until the day you die.
What happens to your digital possessions after y ... Continue reading »
8 months ago
My personal take on this is that most people wouldn't want to go to elaborate details to handover email, messages etc to someone after their death. Artifacts like blog might be kept alive and would die eventually if it's not interesting enough for the next gen. But things like photos, mail etc are the most valuable only to the person who owns them (assuming that everyone has their own mail, archive of photos etc) and once they pass way, there wouldn't be much value in maintaining it (unless the person was famous!). I guess the only thing people might worry about that is that any sensitive information would not be exposed to people after their death. But maybe, they wouldn't care. They are in a different world!
8 months ago
You have a point when you say " most people wouldn't want to go to elaborate details to handover email, messages etc to someone after their death..." But I'm betting that families are going to want to archive - or at least maintain a copy of - their loved one's digital possessions. From there will grow a complicated tangle of issues, three of which I discussed.
Your point about "blog(s) might be kept alive and would die eventually..." also makes me think of the tremendous amount of digital flotsam that is accumulating on the web every day. After all, it takes money to store, host, back up and serve this data - data that owners no longer want. This might sound incredibly naive, but I often wonder whether we won't one day require spring-cleaning for the web!
8 months ago
8 months ago
Both comments on this post begin with "I have thought about this..." - statement on our generation? :P
Interesting that Priya says "most people wouldn't want to go to elaborate details to handover" their digital possessions, while you talk of a ready market for "'executor' services for the e-parts of Wills". Finally, I looked at this from the deceased's family's point of view - what they'd want done.
Wonder what the immediate market really is.
8 months ago
_Access_ to one's personal space and online identity after death has many uses other than just archival and preservation of content placed online.